Are we done talking about BookTok and its influence on reading habits and publishing trends? No? Well, here's another
article on how BookTok's hold on readers may be going beyond the platform. Are some bookstore displays looking more and more familiar to you? "The books most popular with BookTok – such as romance, fantasy and the hybrid genre 'romantasy' – are being picked up more and more by publishers and displayed more prominently in bookshops," goes the
MiNDFOOD piece.
While this may mean more readers among the target TikTok demographic – mostly young women – and books are getting talked about, there are some drawbacks...
...there's a risk it may homogenise the industry. Literary critic Barry Pierce has said that BookTok reads "all sort of have the same cover". Meanwhile author Stephanie Danler said of her foray into BookTok: "It seemed impossible to discover different fiction. It was the same 20 books over and over."
BookTok also has a problem with diversity – in more ways than one. Its recommendations are overwhelmingly by white authors, and it is unclear what the long-term effects of this will be on both publishing and the young readers who flock to the app for recommendations. Furthermore, by catering to this huge audience of young women, publishers are forgoing books by men, especially emerging writers.
Also of concern is whether influencers on BookTok are paid to push certain titles, which has probably happened already. With BookTokers growing in clout, publishers have started banking on the popular ones by
kickstarting their own publishing careers. According to
The Hustle, "DK, a division of Penguin Random House, is turning influencers into authors themselves. Since 2021, DK's influencer division has published six
New York Times bestselling cookbooks authored by TikTok food creators."
The effect BookTok has on reading and publishing cannot be denied and will be discussed and analysed for a while longer as it continues to shape what we read and introduce more people to books, even if they "all sort of have the same cover."
The
2023 Booker Prize shortlist is out and
The House of Doors is not in it. But none of this year's selected authors have been shortlisted before, so that's something.
The Prize's website states that "There are two debuts on the shortlist; there is one British, one Canadian, two Irish and two American authors. Although full of hope, humour and humanity, the books address many of 2023's most pressing concerns: climate change, immigration, financial hardship, the persecution of minorities, political extremism and the erosion of personal freedoms. They feature characters in search of peace and belonging or lamenting lost loves. There are books that are grounded in modern reality, that shed light on shameful episodes in history and which imagine a terrifying future."
The winner of the £50,000 prize will be announced on 26 November.
"On screen as well on the page, cosy crime has been a staple of our cultural consumption long before we used the term,"
writes David Barnett in the BBC. "Go back to the 1980s and think of Angela Lansbury's author-turned-sleuth Jessica Fletcher in the phenomenally successful Murder She Wrote; the US TV series was perhaps the epitome of cosy crime, and indeed shows that the US stole something of a march in presenting contemporary shows that deliberately harked back to the Agatha Christie mould of storytelling."
I first heard the term "cosy mystery" on
Book Riot but had no idea what the genre was supposed to be until now. Barnett helpfully notes that...
...the terminology distinguishes these novels from other kinds of crime fiction, such as police procedurals or psychological thrillers, which are often dark, gritty and upsetting.
Cosy crime, on the other hand, tends not to linger on the death that is often at the centre of the story. Of course, someone is usually dispatched in violent fashion, by way of poison, stabbing, shooting or a good cudgeling from whatever is to hand.
Barnett adds that "cosies" are "more about the thrill of the investigation, generally carried out by an amateur sleuth or sleuths" and often take place is suburban or rural settings. "Police are generally baffled, suspects are bountiful, and murders are imaginative. Denouements are satisfying and leave the reader with the sense that crime does not pay and ultimately, all is well with the world."
If that's true, then the crime novels by Singaporean author Ovidia Yu fall into this category. Maybe Tarquin Hall's mysteries too? Crime novels that don't leave you with nightmares afterwards sound cosy to me.
Is using sensitivity readers censorship? Not according to Quebec author Kevin Lambert, who wanted to avoid stereotypes and not write anything "stupid" when penning his novel,
Que notre joie demeure ("May our joy remain"). Lambert's novel was nominated for the Prix Concourt this September, a major French literary award.
According to Global News, the debate over sensitivity readers was recently sparked in France when 2018 Prix Goncourt winner Nicolas Mathieu, seemingly disparaged the practice, adding that what writers write should not be policed.
The French reaction to Lambert's use of a sensitivity reader sounds like a case of "you need someone to tell you what works and what's right? What kind of writer are you?" Especially one whose novel is being nominated for a top French award.
Speaking to
Global News, Toronto-based editor Ronan Sadler, who freelances as a sensitivity reader, says the role is not to police a writer's creativity. "What it actually is about is helping an author understand what they’re trying to say and help them say it better, like any editorial process."
These days, writers are getting called out more often for getting communities and cultures wrong. Sensitivity reading can be helpful in this, but what I'm against is retroactively applying it to works that have already been published. I don't think there's a point to it, especially when it involves works that were first released decades ago. Books also capture blocks of time when some attitudes that were fine then are not so now. They should stand as part of the historical record of the author's life and times.
Seventeen authors, including John Grisham, Jodi Picoult and George R.R. Martin, are suing OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, for using their intellectual property to train the large language model. "The suit was organized by the Authors Guild and also includes David Baldacci, Sylvia Day, Jonathan Franzen and Elin Hilderbrand among others,"
reports The Associated Press. It's the latest suit filed by authors against tech companies for similar types of copyright infringement.
On the same subject, Meta reportedly downloaded 183,000 books to train its AI, LLaMA, and
The Atlantic has a search tool set up to see which books were included in the dataset, codenamed Books3. After Fred Kaplan at
Slate used the tool and got over his indignation of having only some of his books in the training data, he spots something in the book selection criteria
that troubles him. Richard Flanagan, whose award-winning
The Narrow Road to the Deep North was also in the dataset, calls it "
the biggest act of copyright theft in history."
In other related news,
The Guardian highlighted
another publisher vs digital library lawsuit: "Cengage, Macmillan Learning, McGraw Hill and Pearson Education filed the suit against Library Genesis, also known as LibGen, in Manhattan federal court, citing 'extensive violations' of copyright law." By that it means letting people download copyrighted materials for free.
Amazon has imposed a daily three-book limit on self-published ebooks, in response to the tide of AI-generated books popping up on its platform. Yes, a "totally human amount", according to
Gizmodo. But I'm not with the bearer of
this news who says he's "been firmly against self-publishing authors for a long time."
I hope he was only referring to the types who'd do things like "enrol their books in Kindle Unlimited and trick users into scrolling to the end of the book to 'win a prize' or win 'free Amazon gift cards'" or push error-riddled AI books that may kill people – NOT self-published authors in general.
Why won't Amazon use AI-flagging tools for the job? Because the results
are not guaranteed, probably. Or perhaps all it cares about are profits and eyeballs. Which is one reason why an author and several publishers are
finding ways to avoid doing any business with the retail giant.
"We may expect more from fiction. But celebrity novels remind us books always occupy an uneasy position as both artistic creation and commodity. This is why many of us who care about reading and writing will find we can't agree with the ghostwriting firms that insist books are '
just products'." In
The Conversation, Amber Gwynne, sessional lecturer in writing at the University of Queensland,
meditates on the celebrity novel, with a focus on Millie Bobby Brown's
Nineteen Steps.
Ghostwritten celebrity novels are being discussed
again in the wake of the release of Millie Bobby Brown's
Nineteen Steps. Opinion is divided over celebs' use of ghostwriters; is it acceptable or unfair because of their clout?
The Mary Sue seems to be of the latter persuasion, despite noting Brown's transparency in her use of a ghostwriter. "Some authors will work their entire lives and never get published or never make a decent wage. Yet, Brown could slap her name on a poorly ghostwritten book and become a bestselling author."
While acknowledging that Brown "didn't do anything unusual or illegal",
TMS still ended their op-ed with this stinger: "...
Nineteen Steps is still a big slap in the face for real authors, and a reminder that the publishing industry doesn't judge on writing talent or skill but on which face, name, and story it thinks is best suited for sales and profit."
Yowch.
Moving on...
- Love and dread at a book party? When it's for Walter Isaacson and his latest book, well, yes. "The crux of the unease: Can you trust that a mercurial multibillionaire with daddy issues, a superhero complex and unfettered power will do the right thing?" writes Roxanne Roberts at The Washington Post. "The book has already divided reviewers, who call it a brilliant and essential dive into the mind of one of the 21st century's most influential men — or an apologia for Musk's arrogance and excesses."
- Pan Macmillan imprint Bluebird has paused all future publishing of books by Russell Brand in light of the accusations of sexual assault levelled at him. "Brand's unpublished book – Recovery: The Workbook: A Practical Guide to Finding Freedom from Our Addictions – is a follow-up to the comedian's 2017 self-help book Recovery: Freedom from Our Addictions, which is based on the 12-step programme," The Guardian reported.
- The graphic novel by a local-born author, When I Was A Kid 3, has been banned. Malay Mail Online reports that after a protest by Indonesians at the Malaysian embassy in Jakarta over the portrayal of an Indonesian maid in the book, the Home Ministry announced the move under subsection 7(1) of the Printing Press and Publications Act 1984. The author and illustrator has since apologised, stating that he did not mean to cause offence.
- "On view from September 27 through December 30" in the ground floor gallery of the Grolier Club in New York City is an exhibition titled The Best-Read Army in the World: The Power of the Written Word in World War II. It "tells the story of how the U.S. military disseminated more than one billion books, magazines, and newspapers to 16 million American troops worldwide, partnering with the U.S. publishing industry to create pocket-sized paperback books called Armed Services Editions as well as petite issues of newspapers and popular magazines." An interesting bit of history about books in the war, so anyone in New York, check it out.
- "Though it was first published in the fall of 2021, [The Shadow Work Journal] reached hit status this year, after being listed in TikTok Shop. It has sold 290,000 copies on TikTok alone since April ... As a point of reference, Isaacson's Elon Musk sold 92,560 copies the old-fashioned way in its first week." What is this journal and why has it become the latest self-help phenomenon?
- "Fifteen years ago, in What Would Google Do?, I called for the book to be rethought and renovated, digital and connected, so that it could be updated and made searchable, conversational, collaborative, linkable, less expensive to produce, and cheaper to buy. The problem, I said, was that we so revered the book, it had become sacrosanct. 'We need to get over books,' I wrote. 'Only then can we reinvent them.' I recant." In his book, The Gutenberg Parenthesis: The Age of Print and Its Lessons for the Age of the Internet, Jeff Jarvis revisits his notions about the book and decides that, well, the book doesn't need reinventing.
- "The Radioactive team under Stonewitch worked with creators to make stories, while Stonewitch schmoosed with the studios. When the talks became interesting, Stonewitch would tell the creators about it. Name names. To get them excited. Jazzed. Supercharged. Until a check was late, and a creator reached out to Stonewitch. Their buddy. Their friend. All-around nice guy who would never, ever screw around with them." From PopVerse, a cautionary tale of a comics publisher gone bad.
- Variety reports that "The WGA and major studios and streamers have reached a tentative agreement on a new three-year contract that promises to end the 146-day strike that has taken a heavy toll across the content industry." The sigh of relief is palpable, with the writers going back to work this Wednesday.Now the attention is on whether the Screen Actors Guild can come up with a deal with the studios.
- "My office is 15 minutes away from home. It's an old Victorian house that has a coach house in the back. The [main] house is for the foundation and my office, but the coach house is for my writing. It's very lovely, all painted white stark, very simple, no clutter. I don't do any other work there. I can spend many hours there." Isabel Allende tells The Cut how she gets her writing done.
- "Archie Comics gave me my first taste of Americana. In fact, my idea of what American fast foods like hotdogs or burgers should look like came from there." A new Netflix feature kicks off look into the links between Indian youth and the Riverdale universe.
